Thoughts On Changing The World-edited

Thoughts On Changing The World
Original written Dec. 2007 for Multiply Blog- Response to a comment- edit 2014

“…the claim that humanity can and must do what no God actually does or is able to do is both presumptuous and intrinsically false.”

The problem I see in the statement is that, presumptuous, or not, lassitude in trying to create a just world by claiming we can do nothing, anyway, so leave it to God, or natural law, or whatever outside ourselves, is a kind of moral dereliction of duty. To quote a seventies maxim, “if you are not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.”

The basic problem with concepts such as Justice, Love, Mercy, and Truth is in the way they are defined. What is considered Just changes according to context and culture. In Iran, the beating and hanging of those suspected of homosexuality is Justice. The fact that it is Justice is documented (so it is claimed) by the Koran and the resulting commentaries upon it. This is equally true of the Hebrew Testament and their early commentaries. It seems a fairly recent phenomenon, if I may use that term, that this is being challenged and re-interpreted in any major way. Each interpretation comes with its own rationalizations, often contradictory to each other (which is equally true of the original source material).

I know that Plato-ism holds that the pure forms of concepts exist in some abstract realm. There is pure Justice, Pure Mercy, Pure Evil, etc., of which our human understandings are only very pale, if not counterfeits, copies. I tend to believe, which I’m sure you realize, that these ideas have no reality beyond our definition of them. As with all theories (and by theories, I mean, here, those things without practical evidence as support), there is no provable, or improvable, evidence of their truth or error. What we have, instead, is rationalizations.

I am not sure it really matters, in this instance, which theory is truth or error. Perhaps they are both true, perhaps they are both erroneous. More likely (so I like to think) they are both truth and error and a closer truth would be a synthesis of both. However, that, too, is theoretical.

What does matter is that, in either/all case(s), we are still obliged, for the sake of our own happiness, individual and collective, to strive for clearer understandings, more precise definitions of whatever concept with which we are concerned. We cannot just leave it to God to endow us miraculously with the knowledge. As the Bible would have it, He was not too keen about our eating of the Tree of Knowledge (of good and evil) in the first place.

I am not concerned with answering past centuries of injustice; I am concerned with leaving the world more Just for the future. I do not blame God for those past centuries. I blame Man. If we can use the past objectively, we can (and do) learn something more of our use and misuse of the great concepts and re-define more accurately our understanding of them.

I am not fool enough to think I can change the World. What I can strive to change, however, is the tiny space that is my world. Life is a pool game and my actions billiard balls. The correct force and direction applied to my ball will change the table to the most advantageous state for my partner’s next progression. Whatever else, knowledge of the game, a beneficent sponsor, that accompanies my play, it is still my performance that is central to my game


About elrondsilvermaul

I never know what to say about myself. I let what I write try to speak as to who I am. I can only add, here, that I am 72, live in a nursing home, am twenty years a cancer survivor, and identify as a gay male. I intend to use this blog as storage for poems? written over the long years (and still being written). This does not preclude other uses.
This entry was posted in POT POURRI and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Thoughts On Changing The World-edited

  1. tt4r says:

    I think the problem is the human identity fails to under stand itself as a part. There are many self-s in various times, contexts and situations. All is experience, our reality is projected by the whole body who is present in the present, alive in creation, touched by the rest of creation, next to other wholes in reality.

    While no distinction is made between our projected reality and reality, our self and the whole self in and of reality, humanity can only get better or closer, seem to or not. The noumenal world of absolutes does exist, but beyond our projected reality. It is an important point, don’t you think?

    What we consider direct and immediate is our isolation in projection, with indications of what may be in reality. The whole body is a spacial entity in reality however, for we as identity and self are his or her projected part. I feel one may relate with and be touched by reality, in learning to relate with the whole body. My blog is about this.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s